Showing posts with label att. Show all posts
Showing posts with label att. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 12, 2010

UPDATE: Thoughts on Free Wi-Fi

1/12/2010

Good NYT article on what the airlines are doing with internet access on planes. I found it encouraging that most of the big carriers are moving forward with Wi-Fi installation. Also, found it interesting how Continental is approaching the topic: testing a full internet capability and an email/text messaging capability with DirecTV.

12/16/2009
UPDATE: "McDonald's Adds Free Wi-Fi to the Menu"

Well, not sure if it's a victory, but I think it might be. McDonald's, obviously, has a lot of presence in the marketplace. I might be more inclined to go into McDonald's -- hopefully, not to eat the food. The way I see it, if I am more inclined to spend more time at McDonald's, I assume more folks will, too. It will be interesting to see the McDonald's return on investment with this, and to see if others follow. I think McDonald's is going to reap benefits here, and it will be a case study for the "If you offer free Wi-Fi, they will come."

Don't forget to sign up for Random Thoughts updates via email in the right margin.

June 2009

It's been a while since I have done any significant traveling, but recently I have been on planes and trains and staying at hotels. In the time since I last actively traveled, smartphones and netbooks have become prolific. I have one of each and with 3G connectivity I am never far from the network. But what about the free Wi-Fi revolution?

It kind of surprised me that businesses have yet to figure out the Wi-Fi mystery: if you build a FREE Wi-Fi network, people will come. The fact that businesses are still trying to charge for this service is kind of mind-boggling.

A good example is McDonald's. Walk into most McDonald's these days and right on the door is a sign advertising Wi-Fi. The catch is that they want to charge you for the service. When was the last time you saw someone pull out their laptop in McDonald's?

Another example is Starbucks. It's pretty difficult to drive more than a few miles these days and not drive by a Starbucks -- they are everywhere; the preeminent coffee shop in the world. But they still have not solved the Wi-Fi mystery. Sure, Starbucks has Wi-Fi, but it's provided by T-Mobile and AT&T and Starbucks wants to charge you for it. Now, to be sure, there are people in Starbucks coffee shops connected to Wi-Fi on laptops and smartphpones, but there probably would be more, buying more expensive drinks and snacks, if Starbucks provided Wi-Fi as a complimentary service.

How about hotels? Most budget and mid-scale hotel chains are now providing free Wi-Fi access, but the definition of access is open to wide interpretation. Some have great, four-bar access in rooms, while others advertise free Wi-Fi, but it can only be reliably accessed from the lobby. Upscale hotels are a different story with most still charging for this service. I find this silly and, all things being equal, avoid upscale hotels in search of free access to Wi-Fi when I travel.

I'm no frequent flier, but in the past few months I've been to airports in Jacksonville, NC, Charlotte, NYC, Flint, Milwaukee, and Chicago. If my brain serves me correct, all these airports offered Wi-Fi through the Boingo network, which appears to service many different airports. It's a service you must pay for. I'm on the fence here because you can't choose an airport like a restaurant, coffee shop or hotel, so from a capitalist perspective you have a captive audience and it makes sense to charge for the service. But as a consumer, I would like to see free Wi-Fi at airports.

A company named Aircell is currently fitting U.S. airplanes with Wi-Fi connectivity. By the end of this year, Aircell plans to have one thousand planes Wi-Fi enabled and is planning on having two thousand on line by the end of next year. The price to outfit each plane is roughly one hundred thousand dollars. Airlines are planning to charge for this service, with per flight rates for occasional travelers and monthly subscription rates for frequent travelers. Much like the airports, initially charging for this service makes sense. However, as more airlines come on line, this service should become a commodity. I know I would most likely choose to fly an airline that offered free Wi-Fi over one that did not. Airlines, are you listening...?

Wi-Fi on trains is spotty. Many business commuter rails are beginning to offer Wi-Fi, which is a good thing. But Amtrak provides Wi-Fi service only on some of its routes. I would think that eventually Amtrak will start outfitting more of its trains with Wi-Fi, especially since the airline industry is beginning to come on board. Time will tell.

In the short term, I can understand charging a nominal fee for Wi-Fi access in airports and on planes and trains, but as this market matures, Wi-Fi service should be expected for free. As for restaurants, coffee shops and hotels, Wi-Fi should be a "no brainer" complimentary service. If restaurants, coffee shops, and hotels are not already offering free Wi-Fi, they are probably already losing customers, and missing out on those that would come through the door for the free service.

Monday, December 28, 2009

UPDATE: Traveling Without a "Net"


I remember visiting NYC back in March and complaining about the terrible reception I was receiving with my iPhone. It struck me as odd that I was in one of the most visited cities in the world, a cosmopolitan destination, and I could barely send and receive data, and kept dropping calls.

I've been following the recent cell coverage war between AT&T and Verizon, and independent studies have shown that AT&T does in fact have a faster network (coverage is a different story), but it appears they still don't still don't have the coverage problem sorted out in NYC.

Another angle on this story is the recent rumblings from AT&T that their network is "overwhelmed" with "data hog" users. The smartphone market (specifically, the iPhone) is growing faster than AT&T can expand their network. AT&T CEO Ralph De la Vega has gone so far as to say that AT&T is experimenting with the idea of charging for data usage -- very similar to how cell phone minutes are currently charged.

One would think that fixing the the coverage problem in NYC would be a good investment for AT&T, and not that difficult of a fix. Turning your back on the smartphone market as it continues to expand is probably not a good business decision. Charging users for data usage is not something I'm too excited about.

March 1, 2009

The title is a little dramatic, and not entirely true. Traveling
without a net, what does that mean?

It means since I have started blogging again this is the first time I
have traveled without a laptop -- hence, without the net and the
ability to post to a blog. Get it?

So what? Well, I'm writing this post on my iPhone, sitting in a plane
in Charlotte, NC. Once finished, I will send it to my blog for posting.

I can tell you are not impressed, but the amazing thing is that I am
posting to a web site (my blog) simply by sending an email.

I'm sure to most veteran bloggers this is not all that big of a deal.
To me it was a revelation of the power of Web 2.0. Think about, no
access to a browser, but I can continue to write and post thoughts to
my blog.

So, maybe not traveling without out a net, but traveling with a mobile net...

Post note: I wrote this blog on Friday, 27 February with the intention
of posting it once I arrived in NYC. However, upon arrival in the
city I found that my 3G connection, actually, cell phone connection in
general, was spotty. How strange is that, I get better cell coverage
in Jacksonville, NC than I do in NYC? AT&T, can you hear me now...?